The murder of Du Jinna triggered a chain reaction： Putin took the shot, many countries were involved, and the attitude of the United States was subtle
Beijing, August 24th (Reporter Meng Xiangjun) "A despicable and cruel crime took the life of Dalia Dujinna, who has a real Russian heart … … She proved by action what a Russian patriot is. "
On August 22nd, Russian President Vladimir Putin sent a special message of condolence, which made the recent murder of Dujinna, the daughter of the famous Russian public activist Alexander Du Jin, a new high.
Du Jinna’s death triggered a chain reaction. Unexpectedly, besides Russia and Ukraine, there are other countries involved … …
[Female killer surfaced, Uzbekistan denied it]
Du Jinna’s father, Du Jin, is a Russian sociologist, philosopher and theorist. He used to be the former chairman of the Russian State Duma and an adviser to the director of the Foreign Intelligence Agency. In the eyes of the West, Du Jin is an "extreme-minded" nationalist who once joined Putin’s think tank. The father and daughter supported Crimea’s entry into Russia and Russia’s military action against Ukraine, and were therefore sanctioned by the United States and the West.
After Du Jinna’s car caught fire and exploded, resulting in her death, Du Jin lamented that her daughter was "a rising star in Ran Ran" in her career, but "the Russian enemy assassinated her despicable".
On the 22nd, the Russian Federal Security Service "Running" solved the case and announced that the murder of Dujinna was planned and implemented by the Ukrainian intelligence department, and the executor was Ukrainian citizen natalia Pavlovna Vovk, born in 1979.
Russia revealed that Vovk took his 12-year-old daughter to Russia on July 23rd. In order to carry out tracking and surveillance, she rented a house in the building where Du Jinna lived, and switched to use the license plates of Donetsk, Kazakhstan and Ukraine when entering, committing crimes and leaving the country. After remotely detonating the bomb at the bottom of Dujinna’s car, Vovk fled to Estonia with her daughter.
It was also revealed that Vovk had served in the office of the Ukrainian armed forces, and he was thoughtful and "kept his mouth shut to everyone".
On the 21st, Zacharova, a spokesman for the Russian Foreign Ministry, said bluntly that if it was confirmed that there were "traces of Ukraine" in this case, it would be "Kiev’s state terrorism policy".
Podolyak, adviser to the President of Ukraine, denied that Ukraine was involved, saying that Ukraine was "by no means a terrorist country". The Ukrainian Defense Intelligence Agency stated that the Ukrainian National Guard was not involved in the incident, and denied Russian media reports that Vovk had served in the Azov Battalion.
[Putin’s two actions and triple signals]
Rumors are flying all over the sky. The Kremlin, which has been silent for two days, announced on the 22nd that Russian President Vladimir Putin sent a message of condolence to Dujinna’s family and signed an order to posthumously award her the Medal of Courage.
The condolence message described Du Jinna as "smart, talented, kind and caring", saying that "she proved what a Russian patriot is with her actions".
Putin’s voice at the critical moment and Russia’s quick identification of the murderer at least embody three subtext: ↓ ↓
First, appease the Russians. How can Russia swallow this tone when such an excellent "daughter of the country" has suffered bad luck? She is a hero and will not die in vain. Russia will remember her. Don’t forget that Ukraine caused all this.
Second, remind Ukraine. Your sneak attack was looked down upon, and we quickly solved the case and got a panoramic view of all the details. You have succeeded, but you have lost points morally. The whole world knows what you have done.
But at the same time, this matter has to arouse the high vigilance of Russia. The Ukrainian "killer" can easily go deep into Moscow by simple disguise, assassinate celebrities and walk away. This is a sign of how dangerous it is. This means that there is a loophole in Moscow’s proud intelligence and security defense line, which is by no means a minor problem … …
Thirdly, as Du Jin himself said, he reminded the United States and the West behind Ukraine that Russia "must win" in the conflict with Ukraine. This conflict has been going on for half a year, and the two sides are still locked in a fight. If anyone wants to bluff Russia by taking a slant, it is a miscalculation.
[Many countries are involved in the storm, and the attitude of the United States is vague]
Russia’s will is very firm. Vovk flew to Estonia, even if she dug three feet, Russia would extradite her to Russia for trial.
On the 22nd, Dzhabarov, first vice-chairman of the International Committee of the Russian Federation Council, said that if Estonia refused to extradite Vovk, Russia would take "tough measures" against that country.
Estonia is backed by NATO, so naturally it will not bow to Russia. Salou, Foreign Minister of Ireland, said that the Russian statement on Vovk was "provocative". In his view, it was because Estonia supported Ukraine that Russia tried to put pressure on this matter.
According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the information of people crossing the border can only be released when it is in compliance with the law. As long as Vovk does not leave the country, Russia and Ireland will be caught in a tug-of-war of extradition.
On the other hand, although the Russian side believes that the target of the attack was not Du Jin, the father of Du Jinna, some analysis has linked this matter to Du Jin’s political stance. Markov, director of the Russian Institute of Political Studies, believes that Du Jin’s pro-Turkish and pro-Azerbaijani stance does not rule out that those who planned the assassination were those who opposed Turkey and Azerbaijan.
Perincek, secretary general of the Turkish Motherland Party, said on the 21st that the murder of Dujinna was not only aimed at Russia, but also at the will and actions of countries in the region, especially trying to disrupt the process of "cooperation and anti-America" between Turkey and Russia in Syria.
Compared with Estonia, Turkey suddenly stood out, which certainly attracted attention. Why did it cross Ukraine and point directly at the United States?
One sign is that Turkey once "held a group" with Azerbaijan and Pakistan, strengthened military and trade cooperation and coordinated political stance, and tried to resist American hegemony.
More obviously, it is a series of operations by Turkish President Erdogan after the start of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. ↓ ↓
Whether it is signing grain export agreements with Russia, Ukraine and the United Nations separately, it has become the "leader" in importing grain from Ukraine; Still looking forward to the meeting between Putin and Zelensky and determining the future road map of Uzbekistan; Or strengthen energy trade with Russia, and double oil imports to Russia in 2022, with Turkey playing a key role.
In particular, Turkey is disobedient, considering buying more Russian S-400 missile defense systems, and opposing Finland and Sweden’s joining NATO. All kinds of actions run counter to the intention of the United States. Menendez, chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, threatened to oppose the sale of F-16 fighter jets to Turkey.
Turkey and Russia are competing with the United States for the right to speak militarily in Syria. Although the two countries have different positions because of Turkey’s insistence on fighting the PKK across the border, there they need to work together to ensure that the United States loses its influence. Therefore, some people think that the United States is behind it.
In fact, the speculation that American and Western intelligence agencies secretly directed Ukrainian secret service personnel to act has never been falsified. This time, the attitude of the United States is still vague.
On the 22nd local time, US State Department spokesman Price refused to answer the question "Does the US know who is behind this attack?", which triggered foreign media speculation. Price only said that the United States "unequivocally condemns all deliberate attacks targeting civilians" and said that Uzbekistan has denied any involvement in the case, and Russia will definitely draw "some kind of conclusion".
[Open the corner of "over-limit war"? 】
Singapore’s Lianhe Zaobao believes that Dujinna’s assassination has injected new uncertainty into the Russian-Ukrainian conflict that lasted for nearly six months.
The recent revelation of The New York Times in the United States has also revealed some suggestive clues. A few days before Du Jinna was killed, The New York Times wrote a document describing how the Ukrainian "resistance forces" in Russian-occupied areas acted in secret, posing an "increasing threat" to the Russian army. Several months before the Russian army entered Ukraine, the Ukrainian military had begun to train these fighters, aggravating the nuisance to the Russian rear.
Uzbekistan’s actions include using car bombs, booby traps and shooting targets with pistols, such as placing bombs under the driver’s seat working for Russia to detonate when the engine starts.
This is similar to the process of Du Jinna’s murder.
The New York Times quoted a senior Ukrainian military officer as saying that there are two entities within the Ukrainian military that are responsible for supervising the actions behind enemy lines: the Military Intelligence Department (HUR) and the Ukrainian Special Operations Force. In order to avoid being discovered, the base of Ukrainian training agents has been shifting. Each group is independent and does not know each other, so as to avoid exposing the identity of others in the trial after being arrested.
Fox News also mentioned the possibility of "unconventional" operations between Ukraine and Russia, such as cyber attacks. And assassination is a more extreme means.
It is said that the signal that Uzbekistan wants to send is: "You will never be safe." It is conceivable that the boundary of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine will only be further extended, resulting in more and greater risks. (End)